In Nma/614/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Indodan Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion is dismissed, appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 2ND MARCH, 2009.
delay between the period 29.3.2007 to 10.9.2008.
3. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount tosufficient cause. Consequently, motion dismissed.
4. As the motion is dismissed, appeal is also
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.