Case LawHigh Court › Nma/617/2018 Of Tejas Navinchandra Shah...

Nma/617/2018 Of Tejas Navinchandra Shah v. Income Tax Officer -29(3)(2) And Anr

High Court 07 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/617/2018 Of Tejas Navinchandra Shah v. Income Tax Officer -29(3)(2) And Anr
Date of order
07 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/617/2018 Of Tejas Navinchandra Shah v. Income Tax Officer -29(3)(2) And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 617 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1407 OF 2018 Tejas Navinchandra Shah.. ApplicantIn the matter betweenTejas Navinchandra Shah.. Appellantv/s. Income Tax Officer, 29(3)(2), Mumbai& Anr... Respondents Ms. Neha Paranjpe I/b Satendra Kumar Pandey for the applicant / orig.appellant None for the respondent P.C. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. DATED : 7[th] DECEMBER, 2018. 1.This motion has been taken out for condonation of 89 days delayin filing the appeal from the order dated 8[th] August, 2017 passed by theCustoms, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). 2.We have perused the affidavit in support of the motion and aresatisfied with the reasons indicated therein for condonation of delay. 3.In the above view, the motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a). (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan