Nma/618/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Indodan Industries Ltd
High Court
02 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/618/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Indodan Industries Ltd
Date of order
02 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/618/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Indodan Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
## IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.618 OF 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.3076 OF 2008
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 2ND MARCH, 2009.
PC :1. We have considered the affidavit in support of the
motion for condonation of delay. There is a delay of
519 days in preferring the appeal.2. In Para-4 (vi) it is set out that the papers weresent to the panel counsel for drafting the appeal memoon 29.3.2007 and the draft appeal memo was received on10.9.2008. There is absolutely no explanation for the
delay between the period 29.3.2007 to 10.9.2008.
3. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to
sufficient cause. Consequently, motion dismissed.
4. As the motion is dismissed, appeal is alsodismissed.dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue