In Nma/62/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City-Ix, Mumbai v. M/S. Technimourt I.c.b. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion isdismissed, the Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.62 OF 2005WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.65 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax,.City - IX, Mumbai...AppellantV/s.Technimount I.C.B. Ltd....Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.Ms.Usha I. Dalal for the Respondent.
1.The delay is of 1025 days. There is no
sufficient cause shown for the condonation of delayexcept the dates 17.03.2002 and 03.12.2004 andthereafter 22.12.2004.
Hence the Motion stands dismissed. As the Motion isdismissed, the Appeal also stands dismissed. Refund ofCourt fees as per rules. C.C. expedited.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[F.I. REBELLO, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue