Case LawHigh Court › Nma/623/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/623/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Industries Ltd

High Court 02 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/623/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Industries Ltd
Date of order
02 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/623/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The Commissioner of Income tax-9. M/s. Indodan Industries Ltd. Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 2ND MARCH, 2009. delay between the period 29.3.2007 to 10.9.2008. 3. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount tosufficient cause. Consequently, motion dismissed.4. As the motion is dismissed, appeal is alsodismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan