Nma/632/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S A.p. Shah Investments Pvt. Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/632/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S A.p. Shah Investments Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/632/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S A.p. Shah Investments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.632/2008 IN ITXA (L) NO.390/2008
(CIT Mumbai V/s.M/s.A.P.Shah Investments Pvt.Ltd.)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE23rd April, 2008
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
: DATE23rd April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel Mr.R.Asokan
for the Appellant & Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for
Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the
Appellant is seeking condonation of 69 days’
delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the
reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support
of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is
made out for condonation of delay, and there
is no case of inaction, negligence or want
of bonafide on the part of the Appellant.
Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission
in the month of October-2008, subject to
numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.