Case LawHigh Court › Nma/645/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/645/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Central Bank Of India

High Court 01 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/645/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Central Bank Of India
Date of order
01 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/645/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Central Bank Of India, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.645 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 748 OF 2015WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.646 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 745 OF 2015WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.647 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 744 OF 2015WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.648 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 743 OF 2015WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.650 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 747 OF 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Applicant In the matter between Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Appellant v/s. Central Bank of India .. Respondent Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant Mr. Tejas Shah for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 1[st] APRIL, 2016. P.C. 1.These Notices of Motion have been taken out by the applicants for setting aside the order dated 8[th] October, 2015 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master for non-removal of office objections under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules and to condone the delay of 109 days in filing the present Notices of Motion. 2.We have perused the affidavit-in-support of the notices of motion and find that there was some difficulty in locating the documents which had to be filed consequent to the objections. It was this delay in locating the documents that led to non removal of the office objections within the stipulated time and also in taking out the present notice of motion. 3.Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel for the Revenue states that the documents which were not available are now available. 4.In the above view, we condone the delay of 109 days in taking out the present notice of motion as well as set aside the order dated 8[th] October, 2015 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master. 5.It is made clear that the applicants should remove the office objections and have the Appeals numbered within two weeks from today, failing which this order stands vacated without further reference to the Court. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan