Case LawHigh Court › Nma/658/2009 Of Cummins Generator Techno...

Nma/658/2009 Of Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax Ahmednagar

High Court 16 Feb 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/658/2009 Of Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax Ahmednagar
Date of order
16 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/658/2009 Of Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax Ahmednagar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Admit on the following questions :- (I) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and specific findings of fact recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and in view of Circular No.6-P dated 6th July, 1968 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the appellate tribunal...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.658 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.364 OF 2009 Cummins Generator Technologies ) India Ltd., )..Appellant V/s. Asstt.Commisssioner of Income-tax ) of Ahmednagar Circle )..Respondents ---- Mr.S.N.Inamdar with Mr.Prakash Shah i/by PDS Legal for the appellant. Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 16.02.2009. PC 1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.364 OF 2009 1. Admit on the following questions :- (I) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and specific findings of fact recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and in view of Circular No.6-P dated 6th July, 1968 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the appellate tribunal ought to have held that section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 had no application to the : 2 : case in as much as the payment of brokerage was approved by Central Government and there was no tax evasion involved at all ? (II) Whether there was any evidence before the Tribunal on the basis of which it could legally come to the conclusion that the payment of commission was "on a very high side" ? 2. Office objections to be removed within a period of six weeks. Failure to remove office objections, matter to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 3. Respondents waive service. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan