Case LawHigh Court › Nma/661/2004 Of Director Of Income Tax (...

Nma/661/2004 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internationa Taxation) v. M/S Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd

High Court 05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/661/2004 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internationa Taxation) v. M/S Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/661/2004 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internationa Taxation) v. M/S Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and dismissed as such.2.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.661 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.226 of 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2004The Director of Income Tax (InternationalTaxation) Mumbai-38.. AppellantvsM/s Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd. .. RespondentMs.P.P.Bhosale forAppellantMr.P.C.Tripathi for RespondentCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andrespondent. Learned counsel for the appellantseeks leave to withdraw the above appeal as the taxliability involved in the above is less thanRs.4,00,000/-. Hence, appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and dismissed as such.2. Permissible court fees be refunded to theappellant as per rules.(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan