Nma/662/2004 Of Ashta Lokamanya Nagri Sahakari Patha Sanstha Maryadit v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
High Court
18 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/662/2004 Of Ashta Lokamanya Nagri Sahakari Patha Sanstha Maryadit v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
18 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/662/2004 Of Ashta Lokamanya Nagri Sahakari Patha Sanstha Maryadit v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.662 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.216 OF 2004
Ashta Lokamanya Nagari SahakariPatha Sanstha Maryadit, Ashta,through its General ManagerShri Babasaheb A. Patil.. Appellant
v/s.
Income tax Appellate Tribunal,Pune ench, Pune & ors... Respondents
Mr.A.B.Vagyani for appellant.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:18thOctober, 2004
P.C.
There is delay of 80 days in filing theappeal.
2. Despite service, nobody appears for the
respondents to oppose the notice of motion.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit insupport of the notice of motion, we are satisfiedthat the appellant was prevented by sufficientcause in filing the appeal in time. Delay in
filing the appeal is condoned.
5. Notice of motion stands disposed of.
6. Office to proceed accordingly.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue