Case LawHigh Court › Nma/69/2006 Of Commissionr Of Income-Tax...

Nma/69/2006 Of Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S. Venus Continental

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/69/2006 Of Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S. Venus Continental
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/69/2006 Of Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S. Venus Continental, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.69 OF 2006 ININCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1811 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Mumbai M/s.Venus Continental..RespondentMumbai Mr.R.Asokan with Mr.A.D.Kango,Advocate, forAppellant None for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. P.C. .This is a notice of motion for condonationof 256 days delay in preferring the main appeal.We have perused the affidavit in support. Takinginto account the facts stated in the affidavit insupport, we propose to accept the cause shown forcondonation of delay subject to levy of costs.Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and thedelay in filing the appeal stands condoned subjectto payment of costs of Rs.2500/- which is to be paid directly to the respondent within a period offour weeks from today. Office to number the appealand list the same for admission. 2.It is made clear that if this notice ofmotion has not been properly served on therespondent then the respondent will have liberty tomove this Court for re-call of this order. 3.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan