In Nma/706/2013 Of M/S. Parekhplast India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 8(2), the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
kambli
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.706 OF 2013
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.581 OF 2013
…
M/s.Parekhplast India Pvt.Ltd....Applicant
v/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
...Respondent
…
Mr.Mayur Agarwal i/b Mint and Confreres for the applicant.Mr.Arvind Pinto for the respondent.
CORAM:MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J.DATE :9 JULY 2013
P.C.
Having heard learned counsel for parties, we find sufficient cause is shown for delay of 188 days in filing the Income Tax Appeal (L) No.581 of 2013.
2.Notice of motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Motion stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue