Nma/712/2006 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. The Sakura Bank Ltd
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/712/2006 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. The Sakura Bank Ltd
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/712/2006 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. The Sakura Bank Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.32 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.32 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
The Sakura Bank Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The respondents have been served. None
present. There is a delay of 274 days in filing the
appeal. There is affidavit in support of motion. It
appears that the delay between 21/12/2004 to 9/11/2005
was occasioned in the Law Ministry. Thereafter, the
department took time to get the necessary Court fees
stamp and that took some time. Considering the above,
in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to
sufficient cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to
register the appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.