Nma/723/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12 Mumbai v. S.k. Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION N.M. NO.2299/2009 IN I.TX. APPEAL (L) NO.2570 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, MumbaiV/s.M/s.EBERS Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai ..Appellant..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the respondent. N.M. NO.1723/2009 IN I.TX. APPEAL (L) NO.3365 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai..AppellantV/s.M/s.Gargi Huttenes Albertus Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent. N.M. NO.723/2009 IN I.TX. APPEAL (L) NO.3729 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, MumbaiV/s.S.K. Corporation ..Appellant..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.Nonefor the respondent. N.M. NO.2332/2009 IN I.TX. APPEAL (L) NO.3767 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai..AppellantV/s.M/s.Jindal Iron & Steel Co. Limited..Respondent.Mr.J.S. Saluja for the Appellant.None for the respondent.N.M. NO.2318/2009 IN I.TX. APPEAL (L) NO.3904 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai..AppellantV/s.Baman M. Motafram..Respondent.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.Though there is delay in filing the appeals, no sufficient cause is shown. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.In this view of the matter, all the notices of motion are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. Appeal papers be consigned to record. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)