Case LawHigh Court › Nma/723/2018 Of The Pr. Commmissioner Of...

Nma/723/2018 Of The Pr. Commmissioner Of Income Tax - 4 v. Tata Ficosa Automotive Systems Limited

High Court 12 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/723/2018 Of The Pr. Commmissioner Of Income Tax - 4 v. Tata Ficosa Automotive Systems Limited
Date of order
12 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/723/2018 Of The Pr. Commmissioner Of Income Tax - 4 v. Tata Ficosa Automotive Systems Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 723 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1484 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 .. Applicant In the matter between The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 .. Appellant v/s. Tata Ficosa Automotive Systems Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Sham Walve for the applicant / orig. appellantMr. Atul Jasani for the respondent CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. P.C. DATED : 12[th] DECEMBER, 2018. 1.This application is to set aside the order dated 12[th] April, 2018passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master, rejecting the petitioner'sappeal under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules. 2.Mr. Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, oninstructions, seeks to withdraw this motion as the tax effect involved inthe accompanying appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Thus, being below the threshold limit, provided in Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which inter aliadirects the Revenue not to file fresh appeals or press the pendingappeals in the High Court where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. 3.In the above view, Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.The appeal in which this motion has been taken out alreadystands rejected by order dated 12[th] April, 2018 of the Prothonotary andSenior Master. Thus, nothing survives in this count. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan