Case LawHigh Court › Nma/724/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/724/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Manoj Sadarangani

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/724/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Manoj Sadarangani
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/724/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Manoj Sadarangani, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.724 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.240 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.724 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Manoj Sadarangani ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- There is a delay of 241 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support of the Motion. Considering the major delay was occasioned in the Ministry of Law and as the averments have not been contested by the respondent, though served, in our opinion the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause Hence delay is condoned. Office to register the appeal. Motion disposed of. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan