Case LawHigh Court › Nma/724/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering C...

Nma/724/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Kolhapur

High Court 01 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/724/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Kolhapur
Date of order
01 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/724/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Kolhapur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 724 OF 2016 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 891 OF 2015 M/s. Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd. .. Applicant In the matter betweenM/s. Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd. .. Appellant v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I.. Respondent Ms. Ashwini Surendran h/f Ashok T. Gade for the applicant Mr Tejveer Singh the the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 1[st] APRIL, 2016. P.C. 1.This notice of motion has been taken out by the applicants for setting aside the order dated 19[th] November, 2015 rejecting the appellant's appeal for non-removal of office objection under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules. 1. 2.We have perused the affidavit in support of the notice of motion. It is evident from the affidavit-in-support that the advocate for the appellant was under the impression that the objections had been removed. It was only later he learnt that it was not to the satisfaction of the Registry. 3.In the above view, the present notice of motion has been taken out. We are satisfied with the reasons set out in the affidavit-in-support of the motion and allow the Notice of Motion in terms of prayer clause (a). 4.It is made clear that the applicant would remove office objections and have the appeal numbered within a period of two weeks from today, failing which this order shall stands vacated without further reference to the Court. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan