Nma/77/2016 Of Ritz P. Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1(3)
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/77/2016 Of Ritz P. Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1(3)
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/77/2016 Of Ritz P. Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1(3), the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 77 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1898 OF 2015
Ritz P. Ltd. .. Applicant
In the matter betweenRitz P. Ltd. .. Appellant
v/s.
The Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax, Range 1(3), Mumbai
.. Respondent
Mr. Nishit Gandhi for the applicant None for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J.
DATED : 29[th] JANUARY, 2016.
1.This motion seeks condonation of 25 days delay in filing the accompanying appeal against the impugned order dated 26[th] June,
2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.We are satisfied with the reasons indicated in the affidavit in
support of the notice of motion for delay in filing the accompanying appeal.
3.Accordingly, Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue