Case Law › High Court › Nma/773/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/773/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Citicorp Securities And Investment Ltd

High Court 22 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Jan 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/773/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Citicorp Securities And Investment Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Mr.S.M.Shah with Sandip Wasnik & P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22nd January,2008 PC : cause shown is not sufficient cause and therefore, notice of motion is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) Mr.S.M.Shah with Sandip Wasnik & P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22nd January,2008 PC : 1. As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.