In Nma v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,(Spl -3), the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Notice of Motion as well as the appeal are allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.384 OF 2005WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.777 OF 2005
Shri Dnyaneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax(Special Range-03) Nasik & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. Dwij Mahimtura i/b. Bhushan Mahadik for appellant.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.In view of Resolution passed by the assessee Company dated 30/1/2011, counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the Notice
of Motion as well as appeal. Notice of Motion as well as the appeal are allowed to be withdrawn.
2.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue