Case LawHigh Court › Nma/787/2004 Of Director Of Income-Tax v...

Nma/787/2004 Of Director Of Income-Tax v. F.e.dinshaw Trust

High Court 05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/787/2004 Of Director Of Income-Tax v. F.e.dinshaw Trust
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/787/2004 Of Director Of Income-Tax v. F.e.dinshaw Trust, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4th June,2007 none appeared on behalf of the appellant.whereas learned counsel for the respondent waspresent and we were inclined to dismiss the samefor default.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.787 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.220 of 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2004The Director of Income-tax (Exemption).AppellantvsF.E.Dinshaw Trust..RespondentMumbai-20None for AppellantNone for RespondentCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. In the above matter yesterday i.e. 4th June,2007 none appeared on behalf of the appellant.whereas learned counsel for the respondent waspresent and we were inclined to dismiss the samefor default. However, in the afternoon session,when the learned counsel for the appellant pleadedthat the matter be taken up today forconsideration. Again, today no one is present onbehalf of the appellant.2. Under these circumstances, as no one hasappeared on behalf of the appellant, Noticeof Motion stands dismissed in default. (V.C.Daga, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan