In Nma/794/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,V,Mumbai v. M/S Castrol India Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NOL.794 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NOL.794 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NOL.794 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.193 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.193 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Castrol India Ltd. ..Respondent.
None for appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 10TH JULY, 2006.
P.C.:
Heard Mr.Tripathi for respondent. None for the
appellant. For the reasons stated in the affidavit
filed in support of notice of motion, the delay in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue