Nma/794/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Aatur Holdings P. Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/794/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Aatur Holdings P. Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/794/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. Aatur Holdings P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.251 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Aatur Holdings P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji and Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 274 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit of Mr.P.K.Ramchandran
in support of the Motion. An additional affidavit has
been filed by P.K.Ramchandran on 26th September, 2007.
Respondent has been served. None appears for the
respondent. The averments have not been contested by
the respondent. From the affidavit, we find that major
delay was occasioned in the Ministry of Law and also
non availability of stamp papers. Considering the
cause shown, in our opinion the same would amount to
sufficient cause Hence delay is condoned. Office to
register the appeal.
Motion disposed of.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.