Nma/806/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum City-16 v. Mrs Madhavi M. Mariwala
High Court
28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/806/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum City-16 v. Mrs Madhavi M. Mariwala
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/806/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum City-16 v. Mrs Madhavi M. Mariwala, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.806 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.554 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2008The Commissioner of Income TaxCity 16 Mumbai. Appellant
Mrs Madhavi M.Mariwala .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.A.K.Jasani for Respondents
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 235 days delay caused in filing theappeal.
2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. The appeal is against the order of theI.T.A.T. dated 8th February, 2007 and theCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approvalfor filing the appeal on 21st November, 2007 andthe appeal came tobe filed belatedly on 26thFebruary, 2008. The only reason given for thedelay is that due to various administrative stageinclude in decision making process of thedepartment. We are not satisfied with the reasonsgiven for condonation of delay. No sufficient
cause is made out for condonation of delay.Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No.554 of 2008 also standsdismissed.
(A.V.Nirgude, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.