Nma/810/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-City-I v. Ritz Pvt. Ltd
High Court
04 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/810/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-City-I v. Ritz Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/810/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-City-I v. Ritz Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.810 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.194 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.810 OF 2003
The Commissioner ofIncome Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ritz Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Shiv Mutariya for appellant.
Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 4TH JULY, 2006.
DATED : 4TH JULY, 2006.
P.C.:
P.C.:
Heard. By consent of parties, delay in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Office is directed to register the appeal and
place it for hering in the next week.
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue