Nma/813/2006 Of The Commissionr Ofincometax-24,Mum v. M/S Mahavir Construction Co

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.813 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.813 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.319 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.319 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr R. Asokar, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms Aasifakhan, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. 3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay of 351 days in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant-applicant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)