In Nma/826/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jagdish C. Manek, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.826 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2515 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income TaxCity 22..Appellant
Mr.Jagdish Manek ... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for AppellantMr.Mandar Vaidya i.b Ms Kranti Sathe forRespondent
with NOTICE OF MOTION NO.827 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.2516 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax City 22 ..Appellant
Mr.Jagdish Manek.. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for AppellantMr.Mandar Vaidya i.b Ms Kranti Sathe forRespondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant whostates on instructions from his client that heseeks leave to withdraw the present motion.Hence, Notice of motion is allowed to be withdrawnand is dismissed as such.
{ A.V.Nirgude, J }
{ Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.