Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.CMC Ltd ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.F.Andhyarjuna, senior counsel with Ms.Pallavi
Divekar for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 1418 days in preferring
the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on
25/6/2002. The papers were forwarded to the Ministry
of Law on 21/10/2002. The papers were returned back by
the Law Ministry on 14/12/2005. Thereafter, draft of
the appeal was received on 6/1/2006. There is no
explanation whatsoever for the delay between 21/12/2002
and 14/12/2005 and also for the subsequent delay.
Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount
to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.