Case LawHigh Court › Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/852/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cmc Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.CMC Ltd ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.F.Andhyarjuna, senior counsel with Ms.Pallavi Divekar for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- There is a delay of 1418 days in preferring the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 25/6/2002. The papers were forwarded to the Ministry of Law on 21/10/2002. The papers were returned back by the Law Ministry on 14/12/2005. Thereafter, draft of the appeal was received on 6/1/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 21/12/2002 and 14/12/2005 and also for the subsequent delay. Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan