Nma/86/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Shri Ramesh M. Damani
High Court
16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/86/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Shri Ramesh M. Damani
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/86/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Shri Ramesh M. Damani, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.86 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1892 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.86 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1892 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Ramesh M.Damani ..Respondent.
Mr.P.P.Bhosale and for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent, though served. Perused the
affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion.
The Motion is filed for condonation of 145 days delay
in filing the above appeal. Sufficient cause is shown
for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a). Appeal be numbered.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue