Nma/86/2009 Of Tshe Commissionser Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Prakash Airfreight Ltd. Mumbai
High Court
28 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/86/2009 Of Tshe Commissionser Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Prakash Airfreight Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
28 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/86/2009 Of Tshe Commissionser Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Prakash Airfreight Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.86 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2845 OF 2008
The CIT-VIII )..Appellants
V/s.
Prakash Airfreight Ltd., )..Respondent
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellants.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 28.01.2009.
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 1211 days delay
in filing of the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit
in support indicates that the file was sent for
drafting on 13.04.2005 but the draft was received on
31.7.2008. A period of more than 3 years and 3
months for drafting an appeal memo cannot be said to
be reasonable. Hence, cause shown does not amount
to sufficient cause. Therefore, motion stands
dismissed. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed.
Refund of court fees as per rules.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue