In Nma/867/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax-12,Mumbai v. M/S. Business India, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 867 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 383 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12... Appellant.V/s.
M/s.Business India.
... Respondent.
Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ.DATED : 18[th] October 2010.
P.C.:
In spite of service nobody is appearing on behalf of respondent. Affidavit of service is taken on record.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.
(R.M.SAVANT, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue