Nma/890/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-X, Mumbai v. M/S. Godrej And Boyce Co. Ltd
High Court
11 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/890/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-X, Mumbai v. M/S. Godrej And Boyce Co. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/890/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-X, Mumbai v. M/S. Godrej And Boyce Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: On the application of the learned counsel for the appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAXAPPEAL (LDG.) NO. 289 OF 2004WITHNOTICE OFMOTION NO. 890 OF 2004
INCOME TAX
WITH
NOTICE OF
The Commissioner of Income
Tax, Mumbai. ... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Godrej & Boyce Co. ... Respondent.
Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 11th June 2007.
DATED : 11th June 2007.
P.C. :
P.C. :----
----
. On the application of the learned counsel for
the appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and
dismissed as such.
. In view of dismissal of appeal, nothing
survives in the notice of motion. As such notice of
motion is also dismissed as infructuous.
. Refund of court fee as per rules.
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue