Nma/898/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. Selwin Coutinho
High Court
13 Jun 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/898/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. Selwin Coutinho
Date of order
13 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/898/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. Selwin Coutinho, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.898 OF 2012
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5144 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax 18V/s.Selwin Coutinho, Prop. Of Capital City
....Appellant....Respondent
Ms.P.S. Cardozo for the Appellant.Ms.Vasanti Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2012.
P.C. :-
1.In view of what is stated in the affidavit in support, it appears that there was some communication gap between various officers on account of the general transfers that took place between the departments. As a result thereof, the relevant officers lost track of the matter. There is nothing to indicate that the department lost any interest in the matter.
2.In the circumstances, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b).
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue