Case Law › High Court › Nma/912/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/912/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 18 Mumbai v. Fortune Steel Industries

High Court 05 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Aug 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/912/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 18 Mumbai v. Fortune Steel Industries, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.912 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5388 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Fortune Steel Industries ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C. :- 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2.Notice of Motion is disposed off with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.