Case Law › High Court › Nma/917/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/917/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. M/S. Lokhandwala Construction Industries Ltdm/S Lokhandw

High Court 27 Sep 2005 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

27 Sep 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/917/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. M/S. Lokhandwala Construction Industries Ltdm/S Lokhandw, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 487 OF 2003.ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2002. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3408 OF 2004.ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1091 OF 2004. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3409 OF 2004.ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1090 OF 2004. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 917 OF 2005.ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2005. The Commissioner of Income Tax,City-IX, Mumbai. V/s. M/s Lokhandwala ConstructionInd. P.Ltd. ..Appellant .. Respondent. Shri Ashok Kotangale i/b G.C. Mishra for theappellant. Shri Ajay Singh i/b K. Gopal and P.K. Parida forthe respondent . CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 27.9. 2005. P.C. :---- . Heard all these cases together. In all these cases, delay is ranging from minimum 2 days to maximum 195 days. . Heard parties. Considering the cause shown Revenue is directed to remove all office objections within 2 weeks. . S.O. for 3 weeks for admission. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.