Case LawHigh Court › Nma/919/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/919/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India

High Court 09 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/919/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India
Date of order
09 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/919/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 919 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2150 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : Prothonotaries orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Vimal Gupta with Prashant Uchil for the appellant. F.V.Irani for the respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANDV.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 9th July 2008. DATED: 9th July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: . Though there is no affidavit in reply file by the respondent, the delay in filing appeal of 269 days has not been properly explained. The reasons given are not strictly termed as satisfactory. However, considering that the public revenue is involved and the appellant is the Government of India, in our opinion, delay deserves to be condoned. 2. Motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) Motion stands disposed of.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan