In Nma/920/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 Mumbai v. M/S. Mahindra Sintered Products Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 920 of 2008InINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.of 2007The Commissioner of Income tax-2Mumbai... AppellantV/sM/s Mahindra sintered Products Ltds..RespondentsMr.P.S.Sahaderan for AppellantMr.A.K.Jasani for RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned Advocates for the Appellant and
Respondent.2. The appellant is seeking condonation of delay of117 days caused in filing the appeal. Perused theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion.sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.
Hence Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
3. Place the appeal on board for admission in the
month of July 2008.
annexures on the learned Advocate for the Respondent
within 2 weeks from today.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue