In Nma/934/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Bombay v. M/S. Shetnusha Engrs. And Const. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.934 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.456 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.934 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.456 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Shetusha Engg. & Constructions
P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
Ms. Nikite i/b. Dhru & Co. for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 991 days in preferring
the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on
27/3/2003. The file was sent to the Ministry of Law on
27/6/2003. The draft of the appeal was received on
13/02/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the
delay between 27/3/2003 and 13/2/2006. Considering the
cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.