Nma/940/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds
High Court
04 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/940/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds
Date of order
04 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/940/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 940 OF 2015IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 501 OF 2015WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 942 OF 2015IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 491 OF 2015
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. .. Applicants Orig. Appellants
In the matter between
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
.. Appellants
v/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax – TDS ..Respondent
Ms. Priti Patel i/b M/s. Shukla & Associates for the applicants Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 4[th] DECEMBER, 2015.
P.C.
1.These Notices of Motion seek condonation of 219 days delay
in filing the accompanying appeal.
2.
Ms. Priti Patel, learned Counsel appearing for the
applicants invites our attention to the affidavit-in-support of the notices of motion. On perusal of the same, we are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for condoning the delay in filing the accompanying appeals.
3.Accordingly, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue