Case LawHigh Court › Nma/941/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd...

Nma/941/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds

High Court 15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/941/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/941/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 941 OF 2015 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. … Applicant. V/s. Commissioner of IT-TDS… Respondent Ms. Priti Patel I/by Shukla & Associates, for the applicant. Mrs. P.C. Chotaray, for the respondent,. CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016. P.C.: This Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonationof 219 days delay in filing appeal from the order dated 17[th] April, 2014,passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Perused the affidavit insupport of Notice of Motion explaining the circumstances in whichdelay took place. Bearing in mind that the appellant does not regularlyfile appeals before this Court in income tax matters the circumstances setout in the affidavit would be sufficient cause justifying the condonationof delay. Accordingly the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a). [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.] 7 NMAL 941 OF 2015.doc C E R T I F I C A T E Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan