Nma/950/2005 Of Kersi K Deboo v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cir-13 (1) Mum
High Court
26 Apr 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/950/2005 Of Kersi K Deboo v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cir-13 (1) Mum
Date of order
26 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/950/2005 Of Kersi K Deboo v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cir-13 (1) Mum, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.950 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.441 OF 2005
Mr.Kersi K. Deboo, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Ward
13(1), Mumbai .. Respondent.
Mr.K. Gopal for the appellant in support of notice
of motion.
Mr.A.S. Rao for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH APRIL, 2005.
P.C. :
1. Heard.
2. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit,
the delay is condoned.
3. The office is directed to register the appeal
and subject to removal of all other objections place
this matter for admission in due course.
4. The notice of motion is allowed with no order
as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue