Case LawHigh Court › Nma/956/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Nma/956/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd

High Court 26 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/956/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd
Date of order
26 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/956/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.956 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.350 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.956 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.350 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Ceat Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango for appellant. Mr.Nausheth Thakker i/b.Mulla & Mulla C. B. & C. for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 160 days. In all such matters, where delay is upto 200 days, considering the administrative difficulties faced by the Department and the time taken by the Law Ministry, we have condoned the delay. There is a affidavit in support of the Motion. The respondent though served have not filed any reply contesting the matter. Considering the above, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. Motion is disposed of accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan