Nma/957/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd
High Court
26 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/957/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd
Date of order
26 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/957/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Ceat Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.957 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.351 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.957 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.351 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ceat Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kango for appellant.
Mr.Nausheth Thakker i/b.Mulla & Mulla C. B. & C. for
respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 160 days. In all such
matters, where delay is upto 200 days, considering the
administrative difficulties faced by the Department and
the time taken by the Law Ministry, we have condoned
the delay. There is a affidavit in support of the
Motion. The respondent though served have not filed
any reply contesting the matter. Considering the
above, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to
sufficient cause. Hence Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the
appeal.
Motion is disposed of accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.