Nma/970/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City-V v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt.ltd
High Court
18 Jul 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/970/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City-V v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt.ltd
Date of order
18 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/970/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City-V v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.970 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.241 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai Central V .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Central Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.R.G. Bhat for the appellant.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18TH JULY, 2006.
P.C. :
This matter was on our board on 5th Ferbaury,
2004 when two weeks time was granted for filing better
affifavit. Again on 26th February, 2004, three weeks
time was granted to the revenue to file better affidavit
as this Court was not satisfied with the explanation
furnished. Inspite of lapse of more than two years no
better affidavit has been filed.
2. In this view of the matter, the material which
is already on record does not justify condonation of
delay.
3. The notice of motion is, therefore, dismissed
with no order as to costs.
4. In view of dismissal of the notice of motion,
the appeal papers be consigned to record.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue