Nma/971/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Mrs. Rajshree B. Khandhar
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/971/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Mrs. Rajshree B. Khandhar
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/971/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Mrs. Rajshree B. Khandhar, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.971 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.71 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.971 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.71 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mrs.Rajashree B. Khandar ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 351 days in filing the
appeal. There is affidavit in support of motion. It
appears that the file was sent to the Ministry of Law
on 13/1/2005. The due date for filing the appeal was
2/2/2005. The Ministry of Law returned the file on
30/10/2005. The matter was thereafter sent to the
Panel of counsel and the draft appeal memo was received
on 30/11/2005. Thereafter, it appears that Court fees
stamp was obtained and the appeal was filed on
17/1/2006. Considering the above, in our opinion, the
cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Delay is
condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a). Office to register the appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.