Nma/97/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai-20 v. Vishnu Advertising Services
High Court
28 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/97/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai-20 v. Vishnu Advertising Services
Date of order
28 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/97/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai-20 v. Vishnu Advertising Services, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.97 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.97 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.97 OF 2003
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1033 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1033 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-Tax ..Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Vishnu Advertising Services. ..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas for applicant.
Mr.Pramod Vaidya for respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard Mr.Rao for the applicant. Delay in
filing the appeal has been sufficiently explained.
Delay condoned. Notice of Motion made absolute.
Appeal be numbered and placed for admission
on 5/12/2005.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue