In Nma/976/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Tax-Iv, Thane v. M.j.francis, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.976 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.250 OF 2003
The C.I.T. City IV, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Shri M.J. Francis .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for the appellant.
Mr.Paras S. Savla for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18TH JULY, 2006.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Delay in filing appeal is condoned for the
reasons stated in the better affidavit.
3. The notice of motion is allowed with no order as
to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue