Nma/977/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S Lawkin Limited
High Court
05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/977/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S Lawkin Limited
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/977/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S Lawkin Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.977 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 291 of 2004The Commissioner of Income tax-10 .. AppellantvsM/s Lawkin Limited..RespondentNone forAppellantMr.P.J.Pardiwala i.b Maneksha & Sethna & Co forfor RespondentCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. By this Notice of motion, the appellant isseeking condonation of delay in filing the aboveappeal. Perused the Notice of motion and theaffidavit in support thereof. For the reasonsstated therein sufficient cause is made out forcondoning the delay in filing the above appeal.There is no cause for inaction, negligence or wantof bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence,Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a).(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue