Case LawHigh Court › Nma/979/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/979/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Sterlite Telecom Ltd

High Court 30 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/979/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Sterlite Telecom Ltd
Date of order
30 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/979/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Sterlite Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Onfailure to comply the aforesaid directions, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further order of this court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.979 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.1714 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-3...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Sterlite Telecom Ltd...Respondent.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 30th March, 2009.PC :1. Considering the cause shown and the order to bepassed, delay condoned subject to the appellant payingto the respondent costs quantified at Rs.2500/- to bepaid within six weeks from today and also removingoffice objections within the aforesaid period. Onfailure to comply the aforesaid directions, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further order of this court. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) ( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan