Case LawHigh Court › Nma/984/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/984/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ciity-Iii, Bombay v. M/S I.c.i.c.i.ltd

High Court 01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/984/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ciity-Iii, Bombay v. M/S I.c.i.c.i.ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/984/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ciity-Iii, Bombay v. M/S I.c.i.c.i.ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.984 of 2003 In Income Tax Appeal (L) No.255 of 2003 CIT Bombay .. .. Applicant v/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. .. .. Respondent Mr.A.M.Kotangale for applicant. Ms.Aarti Vissanji with Mr.S.J.Mehta for res. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 1st August 2006 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this Motion. Ms.Vissanji appears for the respondent. 2. The Motion seeks condition of delay of 223 days in filing the Appeal. The ground given is that the department is undergoing major restructuring and the assesses are being identified as per the Municipal limits and thus the case records are accordingly being transferred from one charge to other and reassigned. We accept this explanation so as not to cause any prejudice. Motion is granted in terms of prayer (a). Delay condoned. Motion disposed of. Appeal be numbered. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan